• Bob Siems

27-303 Unfair Claim Settlement Practices seem really redundant (at least for Property and Casualty I

People should not bother bringing 27-303 actions because 27-1001 actions are better. (Assuming you can bring a 27-1001 of course. 27-1001 only applies to Property and Casualty insurers. 27-303 also applies to Health Insurers.)

The first thing I noticed about 27-303 Unfair Claim Settlement Practices claims is that they are basically identical to 27-1001 actions, except 27-1001 have jury trials. 27-1001 and 27-303 are superficially different. They articulate the violation differently. "Failure to act in good faith" is different language than "unfair settlement claim practice." But on a practical level, they both deter high similar if not identical conduct.

From an Insured's perspective, bringing a 27-303 is suboptimal. You get an administrative remedy and administrative appeals for a defined list of wrongs. If you win, the Insurer gets a fine and you get damages and attorneys fees. If you bring a 27-1001 action, however, you get the option for a jury trial, damages, attorneys fees, and possible punitive damages (assuming Maryland follows most states on this issue.)

Of course, what do I know? Most Insureds who bring 27-1001 claims opt to for OAH hearings and administrative appeals over jury trials.

#MarylandInsuranceAdministration #CivilProcedure #InsuranceBadFaith #UnfairTradePracticesClaims

36 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Appraisal and Its Limits

Almost all property insurance policies contain “Appraisal” clauses. These clauses establish procedures for settling claims out of court. Here’s a sample from a homeowners insurance policy: Appraisal I

Obligatory Legal Disclaimer (but please read)

Have some mandatory fine print: 1. You are not our client yet. This website and blog does not make you our client. We have to do a lot before we can sign you up. We need to make sure we don't represen